Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Using neurostimulation to understand the impact of pre-morbid individual differences on post-lesion outcomes.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A · 2017 · PMC5699042 · PMID 29087311

2
hedged sentences
0.0005
closest p · 0.0× alpha
0.0570
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantP < 0.0005actually significant
Follow-up paired t tests demonstrated that the typicality effect for low-frequency words after TMS was not significant for the low SR readers, t (1, 8) = 1.6, P = 0.148, but was highly significant for the high SR readers, t (1, 8) = 8.0, P < 0.0005.

also in 132,142 other papers

marginally significantP = 0.057so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
There was also a two-way interaction between typicality and reader type, F (1, 16) = 4.90, P = 0.042, a significant main effect of typicality, F (1, 16) = 35.15, P < 0.0005, and a marginally significant main effect of reader type, F (1, 16) = 4.20, P = 0.057.

also in 26,082 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.