As predicted, there were highly significant group differences for threatening appraisal ratings on all anomalous experiences tasks, with the clinical group scoring higher than the non-clinical group (with high effect sizes, range r =0·51–0·54) and the control group (with medium to high effect sizes, r =0·41–0·46, table 3 ).
← all excerpts
Clinical relevance of appraisals of persistent psychotic experiences in people with and without a need for care: an experimental study.
1
—
—