Dosimetric uncertainties of three-dimensional dose reconstruction from two-dimensional data in a multi-institutional study.

J Appl Clin Med Phys · 2004 · PMC5723522 · PMID 15738918

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.1000

closest p · 2.0× alpha

0.1000

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp < 0.1so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Marginally significant ( 0.05 < p < 0.1 ) and statistically significant ( p < 0.05 ) volume differences are shown in Table 2 as boldfaced and italicized boldfaced values, respectively.

also in 26,082 other papers

appeared to be marginally significantno p-value reported

However, variations in image quality appeared to be marginally significant in affecting uncertainty in the 50.4‐Gy dose point in the left lung ( p left = 0.072 ) and the 63‐Gy dose point in the heart ( p heart = 0.061 ) .

also in 12 other papers

marginal significanceno p-value reported

In this case, there was marginal significance in the mid‐dose region of 37.8 and 50.4 Gy ( p left ( 37.8 Gy ) = 0.093 , p left ( 50.4 Gy ) = 0.051 ) .

also in 5,069 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.