highly significantp = 10 −11
The regression for the dress explained 9.2% of the variance and was highly significant (F(2497) = 25.0, p = 10 −11 ).
The regression for the dress explained 9.2% of the variance and was highly significant (F(2497) = 25.0, p = 10 −11 ).
The difference between jacket scores for those who thought the Jacket was in the shadow and those who did not was close to significance ( Fig. 12 .a, t(498) = 1.8, p = 0.07); but not when significance was Bonferroni corrected.