Sex differences in facial emotion recognition across varying expression intensity levels from videos.

PLoS One · 2018 · PMC5749848 · PMID 29293674

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentence

0.0820

closest p · 1.6× alpha

0.0820

boldest claim

The sentences

a trend towards significancep = .082so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Response latencies for dynamic emotion stimuli The main effect of ‘sex’ showed a trend towards significance ( F (1,124) = 3.08, p = .082, Cohen’s d = 0.34) with females ( M = 924, SE = 32, 95% CI [863, 989]) overall responding 88ms faster than males ( M = 1012, SE = 39, 95% CI [937, 1092]) on average.

also in 2,760 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.