Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Modulation of Spatial Attentional Allocation by Computer-Based Cognitive Training during Lacrosse Shooting Performance.

Front Psychol · 2017 · PMC5758553 · PMID 29354085

2
hedged sentences
0.0580
closest p · 1.2× alpha
0.0580
boldest claim

The sentences

marginal significancep = 0.058so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
One-way ANOVA for accuracy indicated that the main effect in the SRC group reached marginal significance, F (9,126) = 1.9, p = 0.058, η p 2 = 0.12, but there was no significant difference in the post hoc tests ( p s > 0.05), while the main effect in the 2-back group was statistically significant, F (9,99) = 14.5, ε = 0.44, p < 0.0001, η p 2 = 0.57.

also in 5,069 other papers

Because it has already been reported that repetition of the Type 2 task could affect reaction time in the Simon task, and because we had hypothesized a priori that there would be a significant difference between the groups, post hoc tests for the three-way interaction were conducted, and the result was marginally statistically significant.

also in 1,110 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.