A comparative study of three commonly used two-dimensional overlay generation methods in bite mark analysis.

J Oral Maxillofac Pathol · 2017 · PMC5763872 · PMID 29391724

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentence

0.0012

closest p · 0.0× alpha

0.0012

boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantP = 0.0012actually significant

Interobserver variation was highly significant for wax impression method ( P = 0.0012), significant for the radiopaque wax impression method ( P = 0.0418) and was not found to be significant for the computer-assisted method ( P = 0.5577).

also in 132,142 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.