Comparison of Four Control Methods for a Five-Choice Assistive Technology.

Front Hum Neurosci · 2018 · PMC5997833 · PMID 29928196

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0500

closest p · 1.0× alpha

0.0500

boldest claim

The sentences

marginal significancep < 0.05actually significant

A threshold for marginal significance we assume p < 0.05, and for high significance p < 0.01.

also in 5,069 other papers

highly significantno p-value reported

marginally significantno p-value reported

For the the aforementioned comparison, we used a Bonferrroni corrected (two comparisons, accuracy and ITR) threshold p -value of 0.025 for marginally significant and 0.005 for highly significant results.

also in 132,142 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.