a positive trendp = 0.08
R2_19 similarity index values showed a positive trend with AP (r = 0.65, p = 0.08), but there was no relationship between R2_R1 similarity index and AP (r = −0.20, p = 0.63).
R2_19 similarity index values showed a positive trend with AP (r = 0.65, p = 0.08), but there was no relationship between R2_R1 similarity index and AP (r = −0.20, p = 0.63).
The final day of training and the two retention sessions displayed highly significant similarity indices between each other, while novelty failed to produce a significant pattern of overlap with any other condition, even with sessions close in time and despite engaging the largest population of neurons.