Urban versus forest ecotypes are not explained by divergent reproductive selection.

Proc Biol Sci · 2018 · PMC6053928 · PMID 30051819

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentence

0.0540

closest p · 1.1× alpha

0.0540

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = 0.054so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The pooled model revealed that this difference in selection affecting urban and forest CS was marginally significant (CS × habitat interaction, p = 0.054; table 4 ).

also in 26,082 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.