marginally significantp = 0.034
This showed that, for the first saccade, there was no significant difference between the time points (Wald Chi 2 (2) = 2.089; p = 0.352), but a marginally significant effect of the condition (Wald Chi 2 (1) = 3.327, p = 0.034 one-sided) with better performance in FB1 than in FB2 (see Fig. 4 ).