Is reading automatic? Are the ERP correlates of masked priming really lexical?

Lang Cogn Neurosci · 2018 · PMC6134475 · PMID 30246045

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentence

—

closest p

—

boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantno p-value reported

In contrast, collapsing over frequency in the same-different task, there was no interaction between lexical status and priming ( F < 1), but a highly significant interaction between priming and response type (same vs. different).

also in 132,142 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.