highly significantp = 0.0047
Again, the effect was highly significant ( r = −0.65, p = 0.0047; Figure 2C , inset).
Again, the effect was highly significant ( r = −0.65, p = 0.0047; Figure 2C , inset).
Again, the SWS effect remained significant ( r = −0.488, p = 0.029) while % SWS was marginally significant ( r = −0.392, p = 0.087), suggesting that the very gain of insight might dramatically change performance that was affected by SWS until that time.