marginally significantp = .090
As in Study 1, Caucasian impressions showed above-chance accuracy: r = .24, p = .019, N = 100, 95% CI: .04 to .40 ( Table 4 ; the non-parametric correlation was marginally significant: tau = .13, p = .090).
As in Study 1, Caucasian impressions showed above-chance accuracy: r = .24, p = .019, N = 100, 95% CI: .04 to .40 ( Table 4 ; the non-parametric correlation was marginally significant: tau = .13, p = .090).