marginally significantP = 0.08
There was a marginally significant effect of condition ( F (1,16) = 3.44, P = 0.08, η 2 = 0.18), showing that more saccades in the “similar” than the “different” condition predicted the Dm effect.
There was a marginally significant effect of condition ( F (1,16) = 3.44, P = 0.08, η 2 = 0.18), showing that more saccades in the “similar” than the “different” condition predicted the Dm effect.