Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Ruminative minds, wandering minds: Effects of rumination and mind wandering on lexical associations, pitch imitation and eye behaviour.

PLoS One · 2018 · PMC6242373 · PMID 30452479

2
hedged sentences
0.0520
closest p · 1.0× alpha
0.0650
boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = .052so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
When comparing the scores provided by the LIWC, the results of the test indicated that participants came up with marginally significant more negative words in the rumination ( Mdn = 9.31) than in the control condition ( Mdn = 5.26), U = 331.00, z = −1.94, p = .052, while the negativity scores from SentiWordNet were significantly higher in the rumination condition ( Mdn = 0.08) than in the control condition ( Mdn = .05), U = 303.50, z = −2.33, p = .020.

also in 26,082 other papers

marginally statistically significantp = .065so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
There was a marginally statistically significant effect of both trait rumination F (1, 58) = 3.54, p = .065, η p 2 = . 06 and state rumination F (1, 58) = 3.22, p = .078. η p 2 = . 05 on TRI scores, but no effect of either trait rumination F (1, 58) = 4, p = .409, η p 2 = . 01 or state rumination F (1, 58) =, p = .102, η p 2 = . 05 on TUT scores.

also in 1,110 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.