Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Intracervical Foley catheter balloon versus dinoprostone insert for induction cervical ripening: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Medicine (Baltimore) · 2018 · PMC6283136 · PMID 30508911

1
hedged sentence
closest p
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantno p-value reported
The highly significant heterogeneity ( I 2 = 97%) could be explained by the subgroup analysis of the type of Foley catheter and balloon volume.

also in 132,142 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.