Executive Functions and Emotion-Attention Interaction in Assessment of Brain Health: Reliability of Repeated Testing With Executive RT Test and Correlation With BRIEF-A Questionnaire.

Front Psychol · 2018 · PMC6297677 · PMID 30618977

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0570

closest p · 1.1× alpha

0.0600

boldest claim

The sentences

close to significancep = 0.057so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

In the RT analysis Test and Emotion interaction was statistically significant [ F (1,17) = 4.39, p = 0.05] as well as interaction of Age, Test, and Emotion close to significance [ F (1,17) = 4.16, p = 0.057].

also in 2,130 other papers

almost significantlyp = 0.06so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The Inhibit scale correlated almost significantly with the RTs (rho 0.45, p = 0.06).

also in 555 other papers

a decreasing trendno p-value reported

Like in errors, there was a decreasing trend in RTs in the first test, but in the second test RTs remained stable throughout the test (Figure 4 ).

also in 47,180 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.