highly significantp < 0.001
Compared to GOLD-stage 2, GOLD-stage 3 and 4 (analysed together) was associated with a substantially higher possibility of receiving correct treatment, OR 23.6 (10.8–51.5), highly significant with p < 0.001.
Compared to GOLD-stage 2, GOLD-stage 3 and 4 (analysed together) was associated with a substantially higher possibility of receiving correct treatment, OR 23.6 (10.8–51.5), highly significant with p < 0.001.
Having an airflow obstruction categorized as GOLD-stage 3 and 4 gave a borderline significance with OR (95% CI) 1.9 (0.9–3.9), and p -value 0.08, implying higher inclusion in rehabilitation programmes for these patients.