marginal significancep < .090
Results show that the drawings were not statistically different in size for the three measures computed: for “Me” height (M = 189.55, SD = 1389.92), t (87) = 1.279, p < .204; “Me” waist (M = 27.12, SD = 147.31), marginal significance t (86) = 1.117, p < .090; and “Me” width (M = 4.61, SD = 453.99), marginal significance t (86) = .095, p < .925.