Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Sealants revisited: An efficacy battle between the two major types of sealants - A randomized controlled clinical trial.

Dent Res J (Isfahan) · 2019 · PMC6340219 · PMID 30745917

1
hedged sentence
closest p
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantno p-value reported
The considerably lower retention seen with the glass ionomer sealant when compared with the resin-based sealant was highly significant and is in agreement with studies by Subramaniam et al .,[ 20 ] Forss et al .,[ 21 ] Sari Kervanto-Seppälä et al .,[ 22 ] Williams et al .,[ 23 ] Karlzén-Reuterving and van Dijken et al .,[ 24 ] Raadal et al .,[ 25 ] Chen and Liu[ 26 ] Ulusu et al .,[ 27 ] and Kumaran.[ 28 ] In a recent study carried by Subramaniam et al .[ 20 ] which used the Fuji type VII sealant, very low retention rates of the glass ionomer sealant were observed and are much lower in comparison to the present study.

also in 132,142 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.