The effects of stimulus distribution form during trace conditioning.

A similar pattern was seen in Experiment 2, in which the correlation again failed to reach significance in Block 1, r = –.32, was marginally significant in Block 2, r = –.45, p = .05, and was significant in Blocks 3 and 4, r = –.78 and r = –.83 for Blocks 3 and 4, respectively, p s < .004.

also in 4,113 other papers

In Experiment 1, this correlation was not significant in Phase 1, r = –.36, was marginally significant in Phase 2, r = –.61 p = 0.05, and was significant in Phase 3, r = –.97 p < .003.

also in 26,082 other papers