marginally significantp = 0.051
Accordingly, a marginally significant three-way interaction between Group (“small” vs. “large”), Coherence (5% vs. 10%) and Direction (0° vs. ±60°) was obtained, F (1, 26) = 4.19, p = 0.051, η P 2 = 0.14.
Accordingly, a marginally significant three-way interaction between Group (“small” vs. “large”), Coherence (5% vs. 10%) and Direction (0° vs. ±60°) was obtained, F (1, 26) = 4.19, p = 0.051, η P 2 = 0.14.