Nudge for Good? Choice Defaults and Spillover Effects.

Front Psychol · 2019 · PMC6379727 · PMID 30809164

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentence

0.0690

closest p · 1.4× alpha

0.0690

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = 0.069so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

7 Furthermore, participants in the WEAK DEFAULT treatment also had a marginally significant higher prevalence of choosing exactly the pro-socially set default amount (= 100 ECU) (11.6% in WEAK DEFAULT vs. 4.6% in NO DEFAULT, z = 3.32, p = 0.069, n 1 = 129, n 2 = 129).

also in 26,082 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.