2 was not only very highly significant but also had an intercept (−2.23 ± 3.01 d) and a slope (1.03 ± 0.03) which were not significantly different from 0 d and 1, respectively.
1
—
—
2 was not only very highly significant but also had an intercept (−2.23 ± 3.01 d) and a slope (1.03 ± 0.03) which were not significantly different from 0 d and 1, respectively.