highly significantp = 0.001
1 including VTA-NAc was highly significant, i.e. explained significant variability in sugar wanting (R 2 = 0.34, F(3,41) = 7.03, p = 0.001).
1 including VTA-NAc was highly significant, i.e. explained significant variability in sugar wanting (R 2 = 0.34, F(3,41) = 7.03, p = 0.001).
Results demonstrate a significantly positive correlation between sugar wanting and VTA-NAc connectivity in overweight subjects (r = 0.53, p = 0.012) and a trend towards significance for a negative structure-function interaction in the normal weight group (r = −0.39, p = 0.068) (Fig. 3b ).