marginally significantp = .05
With standard matching cueing displays, in contrast, we found a marginally significant cueing effect when the cue was unprimed, 18 ms, t (17) = 2.07, p = .05, BF 10 = 1.36.
With standard matching cueing displays, in contrast, we found a marginally significant cueing effect when the cue was unprimed, 18 ms, t (17) = 2.07, p = .05, BF 10 = 1.36.
There was only a nonsignificant trend toward a cueing effect with all-relevant cueing displays, 9 ms, t (15) = 1.62, one-tailed p = .06, one-sided BF 10 = 1.39.