Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Effect of Chronic Stimulation and Stimulus Level on Temporal Processing by Cochlear Implant Listeners.

J Assoc Res Otolaryngol · 2019 · PMC6453997 · PMID 30543016

3
hedged sentences
0.0010
closest p · 0.0× alpha
0.0600
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp < 0.001actually significant
A two-way RMANOVA on the log-transformed data revealed a highly significant improvement across sessions ( F (1,8) = 33.79; p < 0.001) but no effect of within-session run ( F (1,8) = 0.28, p = 0.62).

also in 132,142 other papers

just failed to reach significancep = 0.055so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
Levels were generally higher in session 3 (6 months post switch-on) than in session 2 (2 months), but this difference just failed to reach significance ( t (6) = 2.37, p = 0.055).

also in 279 other papers

just fails to reach significancep = 0.06so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
If one excludes the data from the subjects tested on electrode 2 of the MedEl device, which yielded anomalous results for subjects ME5 and perhaps ME2, then the effect size is indeed numerically larger for the upper limit, but the difference just fails to reach significance ( t (8) = 1.70, p = 0.06).

also in 8 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.