highly significantp < 0.001
A two-way RMANOVA on the log-transformed data revealed a highly significant improvement across sessions ( F (1,8) = 33.79; p < 0.001) but no effect of within-session run ( F (1,8) = 0.28, p = 0.62).
A two-way RMANOVA on the log-transformed data revealed a highly significant improvement across sessions ( F (1,8) = 33.79; p < 0.001) but no effect of within-session run ( F (1,8) = 0.28, p = 0.62).
Levels were generally higher in session 3 (6 months post switch-on) than in session 2 (2 months), but this difference just failed to reach significance ( t (6) = 2.37, p = 0.055).
If one excludes the data from the subjects tested on electrode 2 of the MedEl device, which yielded anomalous results for subjects ME5 and perhaps ME2, then the effect size is indeed numerically larger for the upper limit, but the difference just fails to reach significance ( t (8) = 1.70, p = 0.06).