marginally significantp = 0.051
round-faced person) and sour foods was marginally significant (angular-faced sour : M = 3.200, SD =1.642 vs. round-faced sour : M = 2.380, SD = 0.865, F 1, 39 = 4.051, p = 0.051, η 2 p = 0.094). 3.3.3.
round-faced person) and sour foods was marginally significant (angular-faced sour : M = 3.200, SD =1.642 vs. round-faced sour : M = 2.380, SD = 0.865, F 1, 39 = 4.051, p = 0.051, η 2 p = 0.094). 3.3.3.
Moreover, the match between angular-faced individuals and sour food was not significant (there was only a slight trend).