marginally significantp = 0.06
For younger adults, there was a marginally significant difference, t (21) = 1.98, p = 0.06, d = 0.35, such that the Route Overlap was higher following active encoding, compared to passive encoding.
For younger adults, there was a marginally significant difference, t (21) = 1.98, p = 0.06, d = 0.35, such that the Route Overlap was higher following active encoding, compared to passive encoding.