marginally significantp = .081
Only the relationship of entitlement and peer-rated prestige became marginally significant when controlling for the gender composition of the dyad, β ^ = −.058, SE = .033, p = .081, 95% CI [−.122, .007].
Only the relationship of entitlement and peer-rated prestige became marginally significant when controlling for the gender composition of the dyad, β ^ = −.058, SE = .033, p = .081, 95% CI [−.122, .007].