marginally significantp = 0.06
effect of the amplitude and stimulus type was not significant ( F (1,22) = 0.84, p = 0.54); the interaction effect of the amplitude and stimulus type and professional identity was not significant ( F (1,22) = 0.76, p = 0.59); and the interaction effect of stimulus type and professional identity was marginally significant ( F (1,22) = 3.94, p = 0.06, η p 2 = 0.15).