Results : No significant differences in duration, gait speed, and Expanded Timed Get Up and Go (ETGUG) were found between the walkers, but there was a marginally significant difference in Physiological Cost Index (PCIs), which means that the energetic cost with Approach 1 was greater than that with Approach 2.
← all excerpts
An Innovative Concept for a Walker with a Self-Locking Mechanism Using a Single Mechanical Approach.
1
—
—