highly significantp < .001
However, in the case of Cairns, this pattern of results was highly significant ( χ 2 ( N = 1,099, df = 1) = 12.08, p < .001, Phi = .11).
However, in the case of Cairns, this pattern of results was highly significant ( χ 2 ( N = 1,099, df = 1) = 12.08, p < .001, Phi = .11).
This was not just because of the greater numbers with zero BrAC before the legislative change: Those with a BrAC above zero at entry to NEDs tended to have lower levels before the new legislation compared to the sample after the legislative change, although this did not quite reach statistical significance ( F (1,967) = 3.42, p = .065; See Fig 3 ).