a numerical trendP = 0.16
Overall, despite a numerical trend, no improvement in the primary composite cardiovascular endpoint was identified (hazard ratio 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.41–1.16; P = 0.16).
Overall, despite a numerical trend, no improvement in the primary composite cardiovascular endpoint was identified (hazard ratio 0.69, 95% confidence interval 0.41–1.16; P = 0.16).