highly significantp < 0.00001
See the problem here? In the Bond and DePaulo (2006) meta-analysis, the 54% accuracy was greater than chance with a highly significant ( p < 0.00001) t of nearly 40.
See the problem here? In the Bond and DePaulo (2006) meta-analysis, the 54% accuracy was greater than chance with a highly significant ( p < 0.00001) t of nearly 40.