marginally significantP = 0.05
[ 37 ] was excluded from analysis, overall result became marginally significant with mean difference of − 0.54 (95% CI [− 1.08, 0.00], P = 0.05).
[ 37 ] was excluded from analysis, overall result became marginally significant with mean difference of − 0.54 (95% CI [− 1.08, 0.00], P = 0.05).
The pooled mean difference of MIDAS was − 2.52 (95% CI [− 5.27, 0.23], P = 0.073), suggesting a favorable trend for the psychological treatment group over control group, but this difference was not statistically significant.