marginally significantp = 0.082
η p 2 = 0.418), the interaction between prime rhythm pattern and ROI was not significant ( F (16, 400) = 0.881, p = 0.592, η p 2 = 0.034), the interaction between target rhythm pattern and ROI was marginally significant ( F (8, 200) = 1.783, p = 0.082, η p 2 = 0.067), and the interaction among the prime rhythm pattern, target rhythm pattern, and ROI was not significant ( F (16, 400) = 1.000, p = 0.455, η p 2 = 0.038).