marginally significantp = .07
Here we found a marginally significant difference ( F (1, 22) = 3.61, p = .07, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ {\hat{\eta}}_{<p>}^2 $$\end{document} η ^ < p > 2 = 0.14), suggesting that (contrary to our prior suggestion) when recognition failures occurred, observers in the active condition spent longer looking at the targets than observers in the passive condition (see Fig. 6 ).