Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Examining the effects of passive and active strategies on behavior during hybrid visual memory search: evidence from eye tracking.

Cogn Res Princ Implic · 2019 · PMC6757087 · PMID 31549256

1
hedged sentence
0.0700
closest p · 1.4× alpha
0.0700
boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = .07so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
Here we found a marginally significant difference ( F (1, 22) = 3.61, p = .07, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ {\hat{\eta}}_{<p>}^2 $$\end{document} η ^ < p > 2 = 0.14), suggesting that (contrary to our prior suggestion) when recognition failures occurred, observers in the active condition spent longer looking at the targets than observers in the passive condition (see Fig. 6 ).

also in 26,082 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.