Interestingly, when the model was adjusted for tIgE (Figure 3 Model 2), the effect of SES on the size of BCG scar was slightly attenuated (estimates [95% CI] = 0.451 [−0.045 to 0.947], P = 0.074) and fell short of significance in terms of predictor of BCG scar size.
← all excerpts
BCG scar, socioeconomic and nutritional status: a study of newborns in urban area of Makassar, Indonesia.
1
—
—