Justice reactions to deviant ingroup members: Ingroup identity threat motivates utilitarian punishments.

Br J Soc Psychol · 2019 · PMC6850106 · PMID 30648270

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0560

closest p · 1.1× alpha

0.0800

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = .056so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The interaction was marginally significant for utilitarian motives, F 1,112 = 3.74, p = .056, η 2 = .03, showing that participants opted for more utilitarian punishment towards a typical versus atypical ingroup offender.

also in 26,082 other papers

close to significancep = .08so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

This time, and in line with our intuitions, the two‐way interaction came close to significance, b = 0.09, t 288 = 1.74, p = .08, showing that the impact of group membership on threat tended to be stronger for high identifiers than for low identifiers.

also in 2,130 other papers

failed to reach significanceno p-value reported

Unexpectedly, the three‐way interaction effect between punishment motives, group membership of the offender, and ingroup typicality failed to reach significance, F < 1, ns .

also in 4,113 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.