Differences in Semantic Memory Encoding Strategies in Young, Healthy Old and MCI Patients.

Front Aging Neurosci · 2019 · PMC6861178 · PMID 31780920

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0010

closest p · 0.0× alpha

0.0600

boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp < 0.001actually significant

Both the interaction between semantic relatedness and age-group, and that between block and group, remain highly significant, even when the MCI patients are excluded (interaction of group and block ( F (2,88) = 28.7, p < 0.001); interaction of group and semantic-relatedness ( F (1,44) = 8.93, p < 0.006).

also in 132,142 other papers

marginally significantp = 0.06so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

This correlation is significant ( r = 0.50, p = 0.013) when the MCI group is eliminated, and it remains marginally significant when it includes only the two elderly groups ( r = 0.45; p = 0.06), which show (at the group level) ARC-scores close to zero.

also in 26,082 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.