Dealing with Too Little: The Direct Experience of Scarcity does not Affect Snack Intake.

Although the bivariate correlation between “need for more” and log‐transformed calories consumed was marginally significant ( r = .19, p = .071), “need for more” and “making trade‐offs” did not relate to log‐transformed calorie consumption in the full regression model, β = 0.18, t (90) = 1.47, p = .14, and β = −0.02, t (90) = −0.51, p = .61, respectively.

also in 26,082 other papers

A significant main effect of scarcity on eating was not found; however, an interaction effect between hunger and scarcity bordered on significance, such that those in the scarcity condition consumed more calories under low hunger.

also in 114 other papers