Critical evaluation of arguments opposing male circumcision: A systematic review.

J Evid Based Med · 2019 · PMC6899915 · PMID 31496128

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentence

—

closest p

—

boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantno p-value reported

252 Each meta‐analysis referred to the highly significant 89% risk reduction conferred by MC to insertive MSM in Sydney, Australia, 253 and called for more studies of MSM who adopt the insertive role during anal intercourse, as well as more studies of bisexual men because of the risk of STI transmission they pose to women. 4.9.4.

also in 132,142 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.