a trend toward significancep = 0.068
4 D), and there was a trend toward significance for ovariectomy to decrease PC2 scores (F(1, 23) = 3.67, p = 0.068), but no significant stress condition by ovarian status interaction (p > 0.6).
4 D), and there was a trend toward significance for ovariectomy to decrease PC2 scores (F(1, 23) = 3.67, p = 0.068), but no significant stress condition by ovarian status interaction (p > 0.6).
ANOVAs reveal a weak trend for ovariectomy to increase PC1 scores (F(1, 23) = 3.02, p = 0.096; main effect of ovarian status; Fig. 4 C), and no significant main effect of stress condition, nor an ovarian status by stress condition interaction (p's > 0.3).