marginally significantp<0.05
This was marginally significant in one-way ANOVA with repeated measures (F(2,28) = 4.9, p<0.05; n = 15, Fig 9G , lower part), however variability was high due to opposite (n = 2) or no (n = 3) response from 5 cells.
This was marginally significant in one-way ANOVA with repeated measures (F(2,28) = 4.9, p<0.05; n = 15, Fig 9G , lower part), however variability was high due to opposite (n = 2) or no (n = 3) response from 5 cells.
On average, both step-voltage (F(4,28) = 19.6, p<0.001; n = 8) and oxoM treatment (F(1,7) = 32.8, p<0.001; n = 8) had a highly significant and very strong effect on I M amplitudes (two-way ANOVA with repeated measures).