highly significantp = .005
The condition × bias interaction was not significant in early adolescence, F (1, 46) = 2.61, p = .113, η p 2 = .05, but was highly significant in late childhood, F (1, 75) = 8.36, p = .005, η p 2 = .10 ( Fig. 2 ).
The condition × bias interaction was not significant in early adolescence, F (1, 46) = 2.61, p = .113, η p 2 = .05, but was highly significant in late childhood, F (1, 75) = 8.36, p = .005, η p 2 = .10 ( Fig. 2 ).
One omnibus interaction became marginally significant, but the pattern of results remained the same, and follow-up analyses yielded the same significant effects.