marginally significantp = .062
The drop at K = 15 was not statistically significant at α = 0.05 for the MH‐Index; however, the sample size ( n = 15) was small and the difference was marginally significant ( p = .062).
The drop at K = 15 was not statistically significant at α = 0.05 for the MH‐Index; however, the sample size ( n = 15) was small and the difference was marginally significant ( p = .062).
The decline in assemblage change at the spatial scale of K = 15 deserves further attention given the marginal significance, despite a small sample size ( n = 15).