marginally significantp = .067
The main effect of identification was marginally significant, F (1, 229) = 3.38, p = .067, η 2 p = .01, 90% CI [.000, .05], β = −.11.
The main effect of identification was marginally significant, F (1, 229) = 3.38, p = .067, η 2 p = .01, 90% CI [.000, .05], β = −.11.