borderline significantp = 0.19
This association was not significant after correcting for multiple comparisons in the unadjusted model but was significant in the adjusted model (PR: 0.95 (0.92, 0.97); corrected p < 0.001). There was a borderline significant difference in the prevalence of the human fecal marker on child hands between arms in the adjusted model (PR: 0.66 (0.44, 0.99); corrected p = 0.19).